!
| British-American Pilgrims Society | China and the British Empire’s Opium Wars: | The Rhodes-Milner Round Table |
EXTRAORDINARY NEW PROOF:Tuesday, October 1, 2019 Vladimir Lenin & Communism were Created by Globalist Newsmen from the British-American Pilgrims Society The British-American Pilgrims Society steals and weaponizes trade secrets & patents for mass surveillance and media propaganda
(OCt. 01, 2019) Lenin was created by the British-U.S. Pilgrims SocietyCutting to the chase, our new findings prove that The Pilgrims Society — with its two branches in London and New York — created Lenin, Bolshevism, communism, social democracy and sociology university curricula worldwide (their recruiting ground) Lenin was coached in London by Pilgrims Society founders visiting in 1902-03, 1905, 1908 and 1911Lenin visited London at least four times starting in 1902 when he was 32 years old. Lenin was hosted in 1905 by radical socialist Liberal MP Philip Whitwell WilsonBetween Apr. 22 and May 10, 1905, Lenin stayed in the London home of radical socialist Liberal MP Philip Whitwell Wilson at 16 Percy Circus, St Pancras. He was attending the 3rd Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. Lenin was under constant surveillance by the Czar’s secret police, so Wilson was evidently a trusted insider who provided him safe haven under the Privy Council's protection. Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky also attended this 1905 meeting.
| ||||||
|
Philip Whitwell Wilson was a "prime mover" of the Imperial Press Conference, 1909.
In 1917, he moved to the USA and used The New York Times for his evident MI6-C.I.A. espionage cover for 39 years.
He appears to have been the British Pilgrims Society's top man in the U.S. We'll discuss Lenin's Apr.-May 1902 visit to London hosted by socialist printer Harry Quelch at 40 Holford Square below. In 1908 (May), Lenin stayed at 21 Tavistock Place. He used printer Harry Quelch’s recommendation to gain access to the British Museum Library nearby. By 1911, this address was used for meetings of the ‘Foreign Barbers of London’, a pseudonym for the Bolsheviks. In 1911 (Nov.), Lenin stayed at 6 Oakley Square. He gave a lecture believed to be named “Stolypin and the Revolution” at King’s Hall in London’s East End. Stolypin was Russian Prime Minister from Jul. 21, 1906 to Sep. 18, 1911 when he was assassinated, probably on Lenin's order. History tells us that the Bolshevik Revolution was carried out with relatively few people. To aid the Pilgrims Society's support for Lenin, Viscount Alfred Milner traveled to Russia in the Spring of 1917 under orders from Parliament to deliver approved aid to the Czar to fight the Bolsheviks, but Milner double-crossed the Czar and Parliament and refused to give it. It is well known that that Lenin received substantial funding from Pilgrims Society member banks in London and New York. Eight years earlier, on Jun. 22, 1909, the Pilgrims Society, including Milner, and the newly-forming Empire Press Union had hosted the Russian President and members of the Duma at the House of Commons —during the Imperial Press Conference. Soon after Milner left Russia in the Spring of 1917—where he had met with the Duma, Lenin arrived by train in St. Petersburg. A few months later, Czar Romanov and his entire family and staff were assassinated, triggering the Bolshevik takeover. The treachery of Viscount Alfred Milner and the Pilgrims Society is quite evident. |
![]() |
First Imperial Press Conference, 1909,
|
|
Pilgrim Society executives of the First Imperial Press Conference, 1909 (Jun.
05-28), Shepherd's Bush, White City, London. See A Parliament of the Press (1909). |
|
| All executives of the First Imperial Press Conference, 1909, Shepherds' Bush, White City, London (Jun. 05-28) were founding members of the Pilgrims Society and the Empire Press Union, which was renamed the Commonwealth Press Union, and today named the CPU Trust. See A Parliament of the Press. |
If this story was not dark enough, on Jul. 29, 1909, British Prime Minister Asquith announced that he was forming subcommittees under the Committee on Imperial Defence
— he named them Colonial Defence and Home Defence (this is the way the British spell Defense), as well as archiving facilities.
Most histories point to this Jul. 29, 1909 event as the founding of MI6, MI5 and GC&CS (renamed GCHQ in 1946).
Asquith even told Parliament that the subcommittees would have fluid staffing that would not necessarily include members of Parliament,
and would report only to the prime minister (and not to Parliament). Most tellingly, he said he would staff his new intelligence operations from Empire Press Union newspapermen.
In short, newspapermen built modern intelligence in Britain first, then the British used their influence to develop and control America’s counterparts (C.I.A., FBI and NSA).
In fact, on Mar. 05, 1946 the Pilgrims Society used the fatigue of WWII to officially combine British Empire intelligence with American intelligence (FBI and newly-forming C.I.A. and NSA)
in the infamous “Five Eyes” agreement. This followed U.S. Chief of Staff George Marshall giving the green light to exchange most all intelligence with Britain, Canada, New Zealand, Australia
as long as they did not infringe American patents . . . an order they have grossly ignored.
Seen from the eyes of a Constitutional American, this "Five Eyes" agreement is treason. However, seen through the eyes of a Pilgrim Society member it was merely another step toward
the one-world government they had pined for since the Cecil Rhodes Manifesto for an Anglo-American English-speaking one world government run by unelected Pilgrim Society corporations.
|
Now, for the purpose of giving a high level overview of these explosive findings, we jump to Jun. 07, 1909 and the opening meeting and luncheon at the House of Commons of the delegates of the First Imperial Press Conference, 1909. Ground zero for the murder of over 260 million souls +
|
![]() |
CHAPTER IV. OPENING OF THE CONFERENCE (Jun. 07, 1909), pp. 43-44 identifies Mr. P.W. Wilson as one of the "prime movers" of the first meeting and luncheon at the House of Commons. The other "prime mover" was Sir Gilbert Parker who latter targeted propaganda against America for the British War Propaganda Bureau (Wellington House, 1914-1916).
“The Speaker (the Right Hon. J. W. Lowther) presided, and the company included, in addition to those already mentioned, Mr. L. Harcourt, Mr. Sydney Buxton, Lord Courtney, Earl Winterton, Sir G. Robertson, the Earl of Ronaldshay, Sir Benjamin Stone [photographer], Sir Gilbert Parker [1914-1916 head of propaganda targeting the USA], Mr. P . Snowden, Mr. W. P. Byles, Mr. McKinnon Wood, Mr. R. C. Lehmann, Mr. P. W. Wilson, Mr. J. H. Yoxall, Sir Charles Dalziel, the Serjeant-at-Arms (Mr. H. D. Erskine), and several representative journalists from the Press Gallery.
A telegram was received from Mr. Balfour, expressing regret at his inability to attend.
After this luncheon, the prime movers in which were Sir Gilbert Parker, M.P. (a Canadian born, and at one time an Australian journalist), and Mr. P.W. Wilson, MP, the delegates were taken into the Gallery of the House of Commons, and spent an agreeable hour in watching the Mother of Parliaments at work.”

This luncheon at the House of Commons occurred before the conference kickoff banquet on Jun. 07, 1909 that evening at White City, Shepherd's Bush in the London West End. As the conference concluded, on Jun. 28, 1909, the Empire Press Union was being planned to carry forward the conference discussions, and then was formed several weeks later on Jul. 23, 1909. It was "directed by the Council in Fleet street [City of London Corporation]" and chaired by (later Sir) Harry L. W. (Levy-)Lawson, son and heir of the founder of The Daily Telegraph, Lord Burnham (Sir Edward Levy-Lawson). Lord Burnham was president of both the Imperial Press Conference and the Empire Press Union (see Officers roster, 1913). Viscount Northcliffe, owner of The Daily Mail, The Times, The Daily Mirror, Sunday Dispatch, Observer, The Sunday Times, among others was the treasurer for the Empire Press Union and vice-president of the Imperial Press Conference.
![]() Back row, 3rd from left: Sir Gilbert Parker Director Propaganda targeting Americans, British War Propaganda Bureau (1914), Wellington House |
![]() Back row, 6th from left: Sir Harry Brittain Founder, Pilgrims Society; Organizer, Imperial Press Conference, 1909; Assoc. of American Correspondents in London |
![]() Back row,far right: Sir Alfred Moritz Mond Canadian chemical and mining owner who profited greatly from WWI; "enthusiastic" Zionist; German Jewish heritage; pro-British imperialist; anti-Russian; Chairman, The Finance Company of Great Britain and America, Ltd.; Director, Westminster Bank; Chairman of Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), MP. |
While we have yet to find Wilson on a Pilgrims Society list, all his friends and colleagues are founders.
One thing is certain, if he was not a member, then he was their trusted valet. We think the former.
History is deafeningly silent about Wilson, apart from news reports of his speeches in American from 1917 to 1956.
His 49-year absence from the history of intelligence and media propaganda speaks volumes in itself. In fact, less is said about Wilson than the early
directors of MI6, MI5, C.I.A., NSA, FBI and GCHQ—all spawns of the Pilgrims Society.
One can reasonably conclude that Wilson was so important to the British control of the American media, intelligence and politics that he was (and still is) “the name that could not be named.”
Since Wilson died long after WWII, it is quite possible that he was Sir William Stephenson’s (codename: Intrepid) handler during WWII in New York where Wilson used The New York Times as his cover while Intrepid worked from 30 Rockefeller Center. The Rockefellers were also founding members of the Pilgrims Society and financial backers of the Tavistock Institute (for psychological propaganda).
In 1909, P.W. Wilson was a member of Parliament as well as parliamentary correspondent for the London Daily News (1907-1917). From 1917 until his death in 1956, Wilson was the American correspondent for both London Daily News and New York Times, as well as president of the Association of Foreign Press in the U.S.
Anti-Czar and anti-German passions leading to WW I |
|
On Sep. 28, 1927, in a biography Wilson provided to the press as an editor for The New York Times (likely cover for MI6),
Wilson boasted that he was so close to American presidents (Wilson, Harding, Coolidge and Roosevelt)
that he was called to Teddy Roosevelt’s deathbed where the dying president allegedly “thanked him for his
services to the cause of international friendship.”
Who on their deathbed would pander to such socialist claptrap? Likely nobody. The Pilgrims Society's one-world government
propaganda knickers are showing in this disingenuous boasting.
With this background at the London Daily News and The New York Times we can look back with fresh eyes at
Wilson's activities in 1905.
![]() John Ruskin. Ideological guru of communism, democratic socialism, Bolshevism as useful tools to subdue and control the masses for the English-speaking white supremacist British-American Pilgrims Society. |
In the first decade of the 20th
century, Wilson was well known as a radical socialist MP who strongly supported
the Settlement
Movement—one of the precursors of communism. It promoted egalitarian
communities directed by a master. John Ruskin is considered by many to be the father of the settlement movement. Alfred Milner and Cecil Rhodes were among Ruskin's admirers. Many of his ideas are embodied today in definitions of the welfare state. His ideas about a universal income sound quite contemporary to some current Democratic candidates for U.S. President. Also notable was Ruskin's well known promiscuity and likely pedophilia—which appears to be a ticket to the dance for British elitists. The British Zionist Kibbutz (Israel) settlement movement traces its roots (ca. 1880-1920) to Ruskin, Milner and Rhodes. In their emerging philosophy of Empire, socialism/communism/kibbutz, and strict control limiting the resources consumed by the masses, was promoted while the enlightened classes ruling over them were to live in luxury as a sort of secular divine right. They argued that this racist white supremacy was just the natural order of things. Ruskin borrowed heavily from models of Christian community while rejecting Christ's teachings on love in favor of “social justice” as society’s driving moral force, with his followers being the hammers to subdue the masses. Wilson’s proven association with Lenin during Lenin’s formative political years, and Lenin’s embrace of communism/Leninism, is prima facie evidence that Wilson's colleagues in the Pilgrim Society were directing and financing Lenin and the Bolsheviks. |
Lenin was "J. Richter"
Earlier, during Lenin's 13 months stay in London between Apr. 1902 and May 1902, he was hosted by the socialist printer Harry Quelch at 30 Holford Square.
Lenin used the pseudonym “Jacob Richter” in his home. As an example, he advertised for English-Russian language lessons as "J. Richter" with reply to the 30 Holford Square
address (see actual ad below). In 1920 Quelch’s son Tom Quelch would become a founding member of the Communist Party of Great Britain.
Then, as stated earlier, between Apr. 22 and May 10, 1905, Lenin stayed in the home of radical socialist Liberal MP, Philip Whitwell Wilson.
Conclusion
On Jul. 16, 1902, Sir Harry Brittain and General Lord Roberts formed the British-American Pilgrims Society of Great Britain.
At the same time, between Apr. 1902 to May 1903 (13 mos.), Vladimir Lenin was living in socialist printer Henry Quelch's house. Quelch’s son later founded
the British Communist Party at that address.
Both Brittain and Roberts were close associates of Cecil Rhodes and Viscount Alfred Milner in South Africa
during the Second Boer war. They were certainly complicity in the murder of over 30,000 whites and blacks in the Milner Concentration Camps, including over
14,000 children.
Brittain and Roberts were also delegates to the First Imperial Press Conference, 1909.
In 1903, the American chapter of the Pilgrims Society was founded in New York.
The Pilgrims evidently groomed Lenin and the Bolsheviks to carry out their plan to take down the Czar and establish Russia with their newly-minted communist ideology.
In 1905, Philip Whitwell Wilson obviously felt safe enough in his Pilgrims Society protection to host Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky at the 3rd Congress
of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party.
In 1908, Lenin returned to 21 Tavistock Square, the site of the first meetings of the ‘Foreign Barbers of London’, a pseudonym for the Bolsheviks.
This part of London housed the newly-formed Tavistock Institute in 1946 (funding by the Pilgrims Society members like the Rockefellers and Carnegies)
where some of the most heinous brainwashing research in the world today takes place. The apple still does not fall far from the tree of these evil vibrations.
In 1909, the Pilgrims Society organized an unprecedented gathering of newspapermen from across the Empire to imbue their megalomaniacal notions of imperialism upon
the unsuspecting delegates, who were overwhelmed at the flattery and attention. The crowning achievement was the formation of a "permanent" Empire Press Union that became the clearinghouse
for all intelligence and propaganda . . . to this day. Indeed, delegates were recruited to form MI5, MI6 and GC& CS (renamed GCHQ).
In 1911, Lenin returned again to London to give a lecture on the recent assassination of Russian Prime Minister Stolypin a month earlier (very likely ordered by Lenin and the Pilgrims Society).
These facts show an unmistakable association among Lenin, Wilson, the Pilgrims Society, the Empire Press Union, MI6 and the emergence of the global newspaper-led propaganda machine in both
Britain and America.
They reveal a common thread to the radical leftist agendas of the American Uniparty and the British Remainers. Their heritage with Vladimir Lenin makes them unmistakably Communist.
It is pretty clear that the current agenda of the Pilgrims Society is One World 3.0. Their first attempt in Russia failed, as did their second failure in Germany and Italy. Now, in One World 3.0 they want a corporate imperialism according to Cecil Rhodes' Manifesto where the masses are boxed in and restricted by communism while the elites rule from exquisite bunkers of wealth and privilege. In the Soviet period, they even had their own dollar stores called "Beriozkas" in the U.S.S.R. and "Pewex" in Poland. If these sound attractive, just ask anyone who lived in that period. They will tell you sad and often humorous stories of the yo yo of want and excess that these stores created because the state-run suppliers just never seemed to have control of their inventories.
One thing is certain, The Pilgrims Society, global surveillance, propaganda and continuous war, Vladimir Lenin and Bolshevism were cut out of the same cloth.
That cloth must be unraveled if the world is ever going to have a chance at more peaceful lives where war is no longer a requirement for prosperity, and where the Golden Rule prevails.
We can and must dis-empower these ancient oligarch families whose fortunes are steeped in ritual sin and murder.
China and the British Empire’s Opium Wars: |
White Horse Temple, a Buddhist Temple in Henan Province |
Part I : Social Credit as Distasteful Necessity in an Age of Asymmetric WarfareIt is frightening how oligarchically-minded figures of a Great Resetting nature wish to use the structures of social credit to modify group behaviour under a post-Truth,
depopulated/de-carbonized world order.
Frankly, these fears are impotent, unfounded and devoid of any understanding of either basic history or the actual power structures managing the world we all live in. This power structure is not Chinese, nor is it Russian. It isn’t even American, although it demands that all three nations be wiped out, their historic cultures reset and turned into fragmented, depopulated regions of a post-nation state global order. Thankfully, genuinely nationalist leaders have arisen in this moment of global crisis and have created an alternative pathway into a very different future from the one which misanthropic globalists like George Soros or Klaus Schwab demand exist. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres complained of this alternative block in a recent speech saying: “I fear our world is creeping towards two different sets of economic, trade, financial, and technology rules, two divergent approaches in the development of artificial intelligence—and ultimately two different military and geo-political strategies. This is a recipe for trouble. It would be far less predictable and far more dangerous than the Cold War.” In the course of the following series, I am going to nip some of the virulent anti-China mythologies in the bud by first focusing on synthetic cult creation past and present, the problem of Jesuits, the nature of China’s deep state, color revolutions, and the Chinese debt trap myth. Social Credit: Not my Cup of Tea but Still a Necessity Let me just state that on a personal level, speaking as someone who is shaped by democratic western values, all forms of surveillance, and social credit offends me. I believe that people should cherish freedom and live in a cooperative world of love, trust and democracy. That said, that world which I hope future generations get to experience bears little resemblance to the world of supranational oligarchism which has taken control of nations dumb enough to step into the globalist cage over the past decades and tie their fate to the Wall Street- City of London run bubble world order. As I laid out in my recent article ‘Guterres and the Great Reset: How our Economy Became a Time Bomb’, those figures preparing to pull the plug on the bubble known as the western financial system tend to orbit one particular organization called the World Economic Forum, with names such as Klaus Schwab, Henry Kissinger and George Soros. And while consumers of anti-Chinese propaganda might here exclaim that these individuals have all spoken well of China at different times, the only thing which Schwab, Soros or Kissinger admire is China’s centralized power structures and social credit systems. Everything that China is actually doing as far as building the New Silk Road, unleashing long term credit for development, empowering sovereign nation states to stand on their two feet and ending global poverty are despised. Power hungry imperialists very much enjoy centralized national controls for the simple reason that these controls would give them the power to make their grandiose visions for a dystopic techno-feudal dictatorship happen fast without pesky democratic mechanisms getting in the way. The difference between China’s leadership when contrasted with the Schwabs of the Great Reset crowd is a matter of intention and governing ideology. Where one is devoted to closed system depopulation and unipolarism, the other is devoted to open system long term growth and multipolarism.
A Lack of Humility As hard as it is for some to admit, we who live here among the western trans-Atlantic states have a much more virulent form of social credit and surveillance state now in place under the Five Eyes and the multiheaded hydra which former CIA analyst Ray McGovern has called MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-Media-Academia-Think-Tank complex). This is easy to see from a top-down perspective, but for those whose minds are conditioned to make sense of the world “from the bottom up”, it is difficult to see beyond the thick veneer of propaganda (i.e.: just being at a rally on January 6, 2021 has countless people on do not fly lists, un-hirable or in jail). Bankruptcy (either COVID-lockdown induced or other) results in poisoned credit penalties for many years which is nearly impossible to break out of for most people. In China, on the other hand, you can indeed find your wallet take a hit or job options limited by bad social credit, but inversely you can also recover your standing relatively easily. Admittedly it frightens me to think how oligarchically-minded figures of a Great Resetting nature wish to use the structures of social credit tied to some form of Universal Basic Income in order to modify group behaviour under a post-Truth, depopulated/de-carbonized world order. But the thing to hold in mind is that mechanisms, like most tools, are generally morally neutral. It is how we use them that imbues them with evil or goodness. Additionally, China is NOT forcing vaccines on their people while we here in the free west are making life unlivable if you don’t get the jab. Recently, Canadians have lost the right to fly, sit on a train or cross a border to the USA without (at least) two mRNA jabs. Millions are threatened with a loss of livelihood if they don’t subject themselves as guinea pigs in a vast gene therapy experiment which is still in clinical stages and carrying a remarkably high rate of adverse events including death. Chinese and Russian federal governments on the other hand have intervened on municipal/provincial administrators who have tried making the jab mandatory at different times and both nations have resisted pressure to use mRNA gene therapy relying instead on conventional viral vector technology. Contrast this with the western nations, where our federal governments have demonstrated themselves to be little more than active appendages of the Great Reseting sociopaths with the only serious efforts at resistance coming from various state or provincial representatives. In case this exercise in humility is still meeting resistance, it is worth being reminded that here in the freedom-loving liberal democracies of Canada, the USA and UK, jailed whistleblowers deprived of trial, or even basic civil liberties has become a normalized fact of life. When former CIA analyst John Kiriakou spoke out against his government’s use of illegal torture, he was put in prison. When Chelsea Manning exposed murderous drone assassinations of civilians committed by the US military, she found herself quickly jailed. When US Air force analyst Daniel Hale leaked information about the murder of innocent civilians, he paid the price with a 4 year prison sentence. Meanwhile Julian Assange rots in jail and Snowden would be in jail if he hadn’t found sanctuary in Russia. In the next installments, we will tackle the important issue of asymmetrical warfare which has been deployed to divide and conquer China from within over the past 200 years. This will include an exposition of deep state operations within China, the use of religious organizations as fronts for color revolutionary tactics, and Soros-affiliated NGOs promoting regime change across Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjiang. Part II : The Role of Synthetic Cults and the Haunting of the Taiping Heavenly KingdomWhether we are looking at religious sects masquerading as Christian or Muslim fronts, or Asian scientology-esque Falun Gong cults Xi Jinping has some messy problems to deal with both within China and abroad. In part one, we were introduced to China’s surveillance state and broader social credit system and asked: Is this type of undemocratic behaviour justified in the modern world? If the west were truly a beacon of liberty and if nation states were the only forces negotiating global policy between each other acting out of a concern for their citizens’ well being, and national interests then certainly the answer would be a loud negative. However, when one accepts the reality of a supranational power structure operating above nation states committed to a specific dystopic formula for a world order, then the picture changes a bit. In order to maintain the perception that China is a villain in the minds of credulous consumers of most conservative media, it is asserted that China is an atheistic monstrosity committed to crushing religion. If one wishes to practice religion in China, we are told the consequences are jail, draconian social credit scores or even the loss of one’s life. Although popular, this perception is entirely bogus. As far as freedom of religion is concerned, China is a land which is home to over 50 million Christians and has over 65,000 churches of protestant and catholic denominations. Muslims make up the majority of the population in Xinjiang which hosts over 24,000 Mosques which is a far greater per capita number than anything found in the USA. Buddhist and Daoist temples abound across China as well. For a refutation of the Uyghur genocide myth, click here. While China is a secular state, it has come a long way from the anti-religious outlook dominant during the dark days of the 1966-1976 Cultural Revolution. Even China’s constitution protects freedom of religion (article 36), with the simple caveat that “No state organ, social organization or individual shall coerce citizens to believe in or not to believe in any religion, nor shall they discriminate against citizens who believe in or do not believe in any religion. The state shall protect normal religious activities. No one shall use religion to engage in activities that disrupt public order, impair the health of citizens or interfere with the state’s education system.” And most importantly: “Religious groups and religious affairs shall not be subject to control by foreign forces.” So basically, freedom of worship is constitutionally protected as long as your religious group doesn’t have the smell of color revolution on it. Despite the fact that it is required that Churches, Mosques, and Buddhist temples receive a government license to operate legally and conform to China’s overarching national priorities, thousands of underground Churches also exist across China and for the most part, government officials tend to look the other way. When, however connections are made between those unlicensed churches and foreign intelligence agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, or Open Doors (all having vast CIA connections), then they are promptly shut down. Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and Daoists are thus encouraged to find less insurrectionary venues to practice their faith. Most westerners who criticize China’s non-liberal relationship to its religious institutions tend to overlook the fact that the form of modern warfare relies heavily on infiltration, cultural manipulation, psy ops, and asymmetrical warfare from within target nations. One such organization is the NED-sponsored ChinaAid (based in Washington and Texas) which finances and coordinates networks of underground Churches as weapons for broader cultural warfare across mainland China. This technique of utilizing religious cells as a cover for undermining China is nothing new, and actually goes back to the Taiping Rebellion organized over 160 years ago. The Taiping Rebellion Bloodbath
Hong’s cousin and partner in crime was an anglophile trained by the British in Hong Kong name Hung Jen-kan. When Jen-kan returned to Taiping headquarters in Nanjing in 1859 he wrote: “At present England is the mightiest nation of the world, owing to its superior laws. The English are noted for their intellectual power and national strength, are proud by nature and averse to being subordinate.” Noted historian Michael Billington cited letters which Caleb Cushing’s agent, and protestant missionary in China, W.A.P. Martin had written to his handler amidst the chaos of the rebellion saying: “The Tartars [Qing] dynasty, too far gone in senility to afford any encouraging prospect of reformation, will now, perhaps, consider the expediency of recognizing its youthful rival [the Taiping] which, catching the spirit of the age, may be prevailed upon toe unlock the treasures of the interior and throw open its portals to unrestricted trade… Divide and conquer is the stratagem to be employed in storming the citadels of oriental exclusiveness”. It is important to hold in mind that Cushing was a leading figure among the Boston Brahmins who made fortunes working with the British in the global opium trade and were always antagonistic to the spirit of the U.S. Constitution itself. Cushing and his fellow Brahmins had been hard at work by this time preparing the groundwork for a parallel Civil War in the USA while the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom were still active in the east. One of the bargaining chips the British empire used in negotiating the terms of China’s humiliating defeat was the threat to recognize the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom as the legitimate government of China. Beijing was so deeply bled from years of internal civil war that they easily bent to this threat and agreed to every condition demanded by the British resulting in the 1858 Treaty of Tien Tsin and Convention of Peking which granted unlimited access to foreign missionaries (again often covers for foreign intelligence operations), unlimited drug production, and free trade among other abuses that crippled China for years. By the time the second Opium war ended in 1860, the British saw no more use in maintaining their synthetic cult and like a silk farmer who extracted all the silk from his worms, proceeded to work with the government to burn the cult which was finally exterminated by 1865.
In the next installment, we will look more deeply at one more aspect of psy ops in China with a focus on Jesuits, London’s Tavistock and other spiritual poisons threatening the free world. * Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , and Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow. He is author of the‘Untold History of Canada’ book series and Clash of the Two Americas. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation . Consider helping this process by making a donation to the RTF or becoming a Patreon supporter to the Canadian Patriot Review He is a frequent contributor to Global Research. The original source of this article is Strategic Culture Foundation |